midtravelmidengine |
Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:33 pm |
|
Friend has a 1915 that was built for his light (1200lb) rail. Ended up selling the rail and putting the motor in his sons Baja (Class 5 car), lost a main and is rebuilding.
Engine specs: 1915 with 40 x 35.5 valves, dual 40 Dellortos
He had a w-120 cam in it with 7.5 compression(or less ccing head) :roll: . 1.1 to1 Rockers. On the rebuild it will be up to about 9 to 1 the 120 cam has some pitting in it so hes getting a new one.
QUESTION:
Should he stick with the 120 or is there a better cam to take FULL advantage if this setup (and heavier car)??
Looking to make the most power under 5500 rpm
Thanks in advance |
|
modok |
Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:45 pm |
|
engle 120, 1914, 9-1?
In my opinion the web #110 or #163 are both better than the 120. (smoother at least)
The 163 may have better low end and about the same top end.
The web 110 on a 105 lobe center might be better overall!
these are street cams, they can be used with 1.25 rockers for more lift if needed.
If the thing is mainly for off-road you might use an engle vz-15. |
|
spyvsspy |
Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:47 pm |
|
I believe the w110 or the cb 2242 makes power to that range with 1.25 rockers. At least that is what ALB recommended for my 1915 build. |
|
midtravelmidengine |
Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:53 pm |
|
the rest of the motor sort of soaked up his $$$ so he is sticking with the 1.1 rockers... Keep em cumming guys! :D |
|
69VWTYPE1 |
Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:01 am |
|
i was told by a guy that now build v8 drag motors that use to race vw back in the day to use a vz 35 in my next hi pro motor ...... i dont know if this the one for your buddy or not but when i tear down my 2180 ima try ths cam out.... |
|
spyvsspy |
Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:02 am |
|
If he's using the 1.1 rockers go with the vz 15 cam. |
|
vwracerdave |
Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:22 am |
|
VZ-25 with stock 1.1 rockers. |
|
midtravelmidengine |
Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:06 am |
|
don't the VZ cams Require sleeving the lifters? |
|
turboblue |
Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:23 am |
|
midtravelmidengine wrote: don't the VZ cams Require sleeving the lifters?
VZ cams beat the lifter bores pretty good.
Resleeving is a good idea or run a cam with a less dramatic ramp angle. |
|
MinamiKotaro |
Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:49 pm |
|
midtravelmidengine wrote: don't the VZ cams Require sleeving the lifters?
No. My 1915 ran for 21 years as Dad's DD with a VZ-25 cam. Its lifter bores still look brand new. Dad did cut a groove in each lifter for extra oiling. |
|
77charger |
Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:49 pm |
|
I have a vz35 in my 2275.Buggy is 1280 pounds with a close ratio 002.It pulls from 2500 to 7k pretty smoothly.
Motor is alm case
44s
cb h beams
ported 40x35s
8.9-1 compression.
I was originally going to use a vz25 in my 1914 and upgrade the rods but i broke a cylinder cleaning them and decided to just build a 2275. |
|
midtravelmidengine |
Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:55 pm |
|
here are some cams that are in the running, let me know what you think...
Current Cam:
w-120___253*___.395"___.435"___108*
CB Cams:
2240___248*___.430"___.473"___107*
2243___250*___.424"___.466"___107*
2250___256*___.420"___.462"___107*
Web:
163____249*___.383"___.422"___108*
110____256*___.395"___.435"___108*
Engle:
VZ15___250*___.435"___.478"___108*
VZ25___256*___.429"___.470"___108*
It appears that the vz15 actually has a more agressive ramp rate than the VZ25, 2250 & 2243...
My first choice would be the Eagle 2250, unless the duration is losing too much bottom end, then my choice becomes the 2243, a bit less duration than the 120 but with more lift for the 1.1 rockers and is a bit less agressive than the VZ cam so maybe no sleaving?????
What do you think? Anyone using the eagle cams? |
|
modok |
Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:13 pm |
|
Wow, you sure have done your homework! I have used the 2250 and 2241 cams. Both degreed in with 6-8+ more degrees than CB lists.
The 2250 came out to 262 degrees when I checked it. It has some pretty steep ramps. It kicked in hard at 3500rpm in a 2165, 9.5-1cr. It may be more than you bargained for. Webs cams have checked perfect to the degree every one I ever ordered. Engles cams have all been a few degrees short.
If you don't want to use one of the vz cams, the web 109 or 122 or 125 look just as mean as the 2250, and I bet you lifter bores would survive.
9-1cr might be ok for the vz-25, but these more radical cams may need more. |
|
midtravelmidengine |
Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:21 pm |
|
Quote: Engles cams have all been a few degrees short.
I've heard that more than once... :roll:
Quote: Both degreed in with 6-8+ more degrees than CB lists.
WOW, pretty crappy, then maybe the 2240 is more the range?
Was the lift off too? |
|
modok |
Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:50 pm |
|
I believe lift was about right on Cb's cams, it might just be luck, but both the 2250 and 2241 had a few extra degrees. How high do you plan to rev this thing? |
|
midtravelmidengine |
Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:17 am |
|
Looking to make the most power under 5500 rpm |
|
midtravelmidengine |
Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:30 pm |
|
anyone else have a recommendation? jake, john, dave?? |
|
Rome |
Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:06 pm |
|
You must match the cam to your valve springs! If your heads are already cut for dual springs and you continue to use them, then you can use the 120+ and equiv. cams. If cut only for singles, don't go more than an Engle 110/Scat C35. |
|
lostinbaja |
Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
I really like the Web 86B or 86C in a 1914.
86b .575/.575, Dur @ 0.050 300°/300°, 260°/260°
86c .585/.585, Dur @ 0.050 310°/310°, 272°/272° |
|
Joel Mohr |
Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:21 pm |
|
I do quite a few of 1915s for off-road, and for single spring heads with 1.1s the 218 Web works great...LOTS of torque, and all done by 5500.... .455x280 I even have them ground on 105 centers for a little more low end.... |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|