Author |
Message |
Dubdealer Samba Member
Joined: November 05, 2005 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is it better to have a j or jk? is it a difference height on the bead or just shape. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrjobe Samba Member
Joined: March 15, 2006 Posts: 533 Location: Ravenna, Nebraska
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cdennisg wrote: |
krisbeetle wrote: |
NAES wrote: |
Lemmerz aka Crowsfoot wheels are backspaced 1/4" more than KPZ and the slot appears larger. Good wheels for those running a 2" narrowed front beam. Clears the step in the inner dogleg better. |
I have 3 crowsfoot and one none crowsfoot 15" rims that I am going to have to run, will this create any tracking or handling problems considering the 1/4 more offset on the one side? |
The statement of the extra offset on crow's foot wheels is a myth. Measure yours for yourself and you will see that there is no more than 1/16" difference in offset between the wheel types. |
Id like to know if this is verified correct. i would love a extra 1/2" wheel tuck up front just by bolting some crows on. _________________ No Coast VW Club
www.myspace.com/nocoastvw |
|
Back to top |
|
|
srfndoc Samba Member
Joined: August 21, 2010 Posts: 3274 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
As seen below, this was confirmed as not being true (the offset is not 1/4"):
cdennisg wrote: |
NAES wrote: |
Lemmerz aka Crowsfoot wheels are backspaced 1/4" more than KPZ and the slot appears larger. Good wheels for those running a 2" narrowed front beam. Clears the step in the inner dogleg better. |
I recently measured one of each and found a difference of only 1/16". I don't recall what the date stamps were, maybe there was an early/late production difference. I will check tomorrow.
OK, I did some measuring. A 5/59 crowsfoot I have measures 4 1/2" plus from the surface where it mounts against the drum to the very outer edge of the wheel lip. A 4/60 non-crowsfoot measures 4 11/16". So the difference is barely over 1/8". I also measured a 5/63 non-crowsfoot and it was the same as the 4/60. I did not have easy access to another crowsfoot with a different date. |
_________________ RPM=(MPH*336* (R&P*4th*1.26))/Tire Diameter in inches |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrjobe Samba Member
Joined: March 15, 2006 Posts: 533 Location: Ravenna, Nebraska
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
srfndoc wrote: |
As seen below, this was confirmed as not being true (the offset is not 1/4"):
cdennisg wrote: |
NAES wrote: |
Lemmerz aka Crowsfoot wheels are backspaced 1/4" more than KPZ and the slot appears larger. Good wheels for those running a 2" narrowed front beam. Clears the step in the inner dogleg better. |
I recently measured one of each and found a difference of only 1/16". I don't recall what the date stamps were, maybe there was an early/late production difference. I will check tomorrow.
OK, I did some measuring. A 5/59 crowsfoot I have measures 4 1/2" plus from the surface where it mounts against the drum to the very outer edge of the wheel lip. A 4/60 non-crowsfoot measures 4 11/16". So the difference is barely over 1/8". I also measured a 5/63 non-crowsfoot and it was the same as the 4/60. I did not have easy access to another crowsfoot with a different date. |
|
from my understanding only 5/59 and 5/63 were compared?
Im not defending the 1/4" statment, im just not sure that comparing just two wheels rules out the offset as a myth.
where does the 1/4" claim come from in the first place? _________________ No Coast VW Club
www.myspace.com/nocoastvw |
|
Back to top |
|
|
61TXghia Samba Member
Joined: July 17, 2009 Posts: 950 Location: El Paso, TX
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
What is the purpose of the crows feet rims, are they stronger and able to support more weight? _________________ 62 Standard Type 2 (Nothing Fancy)
my bus: http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=464719
bill may wrote: |
Camping is cheaper than therapy. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrjobe Samba Member
Joined: March 15, 2006 Posts: 533 Location: Ravenna, Nebraska
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
61TXghia wrote: |
What is the purpose of the crows feet rims, are they stronger and able to support more weight? |
cause they have cool looking stamps that are never exposed unless you are changing a flat. _________________ No Coast VW Club
www.myspace.com/nocoastvw |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cdennisg Samba Member
Joined: November 02, 2004 Posts: 20268 Location: Sandpoint, ID
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrjobe wrote: |
srfndoc wrote: |
As seen below, this was confirmed as not being true (the offset is not 1/4"):
cdennisg wrote: |
NAES wrote: |
Lemmerz aka Crowsfoot wheels are backspaced 1/4" more than KPZ and the slot appears larger. Good wheels for those running a 2" narrowed front beam. Clears the step in the inner dogleg better. |
I recently measured one of each and found a difference of only 1/16". I don't recall what the date stamps were, maybe there was an early/late production difference. I will check tomorrow.
OK, I did some measuring. A 5/59 crowsfoot I have measures 4 1/2" plus from the surface where it mounts against the drum to the very outer edge of the wheel lip. A 4/60 non-crowsfoot measures 4 11/16". So the difference is barely over 1/8". I also measured a 5/63 non-crowsfoot and it was the same as the 4/60. I did not have easy access to another crowsfoot with a different date. |
|
from my understanding only 5/59 and 5/63 were compared?
Im not defending the 1/4" statment, im just not sure that comparing just two wheels rules out the offset as a myth.
where does the 1/4" claim come from in the first place? |
I have since checked several others and never had more than a fat 1/16" deviation.
Not sure where the myth started. _________________ nothing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cdennisg Samba Member
Joined: November 02, 2004 Posts: 20268 Location: Sandpoint, ID
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrjobe wrote: |
61TXghia wrote: |
What is the purpose of the crows feet rims, are they stronger and able to support more weight? |
cause they have cool looking stamps that are never exposed unless you are changing a flat. |
They do look better when running without hubcaps, though. _________________ nothing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrjobe Samba Member
Joined: March 15, 2006 Posts: 533 Location: Ravenna, Nebraska
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cdennisg wrote: |
mrjobe wrote: |
srfndoc wrote: |
As seen below, this was confirmed as not being true (the offset is not 1/4"):
cdennisg wrote: |
NAES wrote: |
Lemmerz aka Crowsfoot wheels are backspaced 1/4" more than KPZ and the slot appears larger. Good wheels for those running a 2" narrowed front beam. Clears the step in the inner dogleg better. |
I recently measured one of each and found a difference of only 1/16". I don't recall what the date stamps were, maybe there was an early/late production difference. I will check tomorrow.
OK, I did some measuring. A 5/59 crowsfoot I have measures 4 1/2" plus from the surface where it mounts against the drum to the very outer edge of the wheel lip. A 4/60 non-crowsfoot measures 4 11/16". So the difference is barely over 1/8". I also measured a 5/63 non-crowsfoot and it was the same as the 4/60. I did not have easy access to another crowsfoot with a different date. |
|
from my understanding only 5/59 and 5/63 were compared?
Im not defending the 1/4" statment, im just not sure that comparing just two wheels rules out the offset as a myth.
where does the 1/4" claim come from in the first place? |
I have since checked several others and never had more than a fat 1/16" deviation.
Not sure where the myth started. |
ah, Thats cool that you took the time to check others. does the 1/16" seem pretty consistant? or is that just the most offset you have noted? _________________ No Coast VW Club
www.myspace.com/nocoastvw |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cdennisg Samba Member
Joined: November 02, 2004 Posts: 20268 Location: Sandpoint, ID
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It has varied from zero to a little over 1/16".
I just got a few more recently. I'll check them and post back here with dates and figures. _________________ nothing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vwmike333 Samba Member
Joined: November 16, 2004 Posts: 68 Location: Uxbridge, MA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
EverettB wrote: |
I'm not familiar with the T but J and JK are types of tire beads. |
The T stamp indicates tubeless tires. You can also tell this style rim by the flat area stamping around the valve stem area (at least on Beetle rims).
Mike B. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
panelant Samba Member
Joined: June 23, 2003 Posts: 98 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been searching around trying to find differences in wheel hubs. Any pics around that show differences by years on the shapes of the cones or spirals impressed into them?
I have a '60 panel and my 5-spoke empis won't sit fully on the front hubs due to the large flaring cone. (Think the po had some bug wheels from a baja on there?). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BulletBus Samba Member
Joined: August 17, 2005 Posts: 1276 Location: Panama City Beach
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a difference in the Bus 16 inch wheels and the Beetle ones? I have some extras that I was going to sell and someone told me to make sure they were bus and not beetle. Not sure on that one. Two have dimples at the valve stem. _________________ 53 Hatch Barndoor
_______________________________________
If it's not a bus, it's bus money waiting to happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
panelant Samba Member
Joined: June 23, 2003 Posts: 98 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dimples were talked about earlier in this post but not as a diff between bug and bus. I've heard about valve stem placement making a diff though. Something like stem between lug nut holes = bus. Stems lined up with a lug nut hole = bug. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lind Samba Member
Joined: November 06, 2000 Posts: 9913 Location: idaho
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
BulletBus wrote: |
Is there a difference in the Bus 16 inch wheels and the Beetle ones? I have some extras that I was going to sell and someone told me to make sure they were bus and not beetle. Not sure on that one. Two have dimples at the valve stem. |
put a straight edge across the rim. if it touches only the center part of the rim, it is bus. if it touches only the outer rim, then it is beetle.
beetle rims are 3" wide, bus rims are 3.5" wide. _________________ .
Wanted:
Idaho VW license plate frames or other dealership items.
VWoA literature and early dealership or distributor literature/pictures/information
. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cdennisg Samba Member
Joined: November 02, 2004 Posts: 20268 Location: Sandpoint, ID
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lind, any truth to the lug hole/air valve location theory? _________________ nothing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RustyPan Samba Member
Joined: November 13, 2006 Posts: 112 Location: Orange County, CA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a feeling these might be bug but aside from measuring the wheel, is there a way of telling what these might be to??
thanks.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cdennisg Samba Member
Joined: November 02, 2004 Posts: 20268 Location: Sandpoint, ID
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^^ those are both bus 15's. _________________ nothing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EverettB Administrator
Joined: April 11, 2000 Posts: 69804 Location: Phoenix Metro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BulletBus Samba Member
Joined: August 17, 2005 Posts: 1276 Location: Panama City Beach
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Lind! _________________ 53 Hatch Barndoor
_______________________________________
If it's not a bus, it's bus money waiting to happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|