Author |
Message |
EverettB Administrator
Joined: April 11, 2000 Posts: 69809 Location: Phoenix Metro
|
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2016 6:46 am Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
TheLadyBug wrote: |
I think I'm going to tackle adding the m6 weldnut to the clamps. Can I assume that the weldnut faces out? Can I see one up close actually in place? |
It faces out from the clamp:
The weld nut is the inside clamp though so when it's installed, the weld nut is toward the front of the car and if you are facing the engine you see the screw head.
(I have a feeling this is obvious to you but I figured why not be super clear anyway for others reading) _________________ How to Post Photos
Everett Barnes - [email protected] | My wanted ads
"Water is the only drink for a wise man" | "Communication prevents complaints"
Stop dead photo links! Post your photos to The Samba Gallery! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheLadyBug Samba Member
Joined: August 17, 2014 Posts: 639 Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:04 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
EverettB wrote: |
TheLadyBug wrote: |
I think I'm going to tackle adding the m6 weldnut to the clamps. Can I assume that the weldnut faces out? Can I see one up close actually in place? |
It faces out from the clamp:
The weld nut is the inside clamp though so when it's installed, the weld nut is toward the front of the car and if you are facing the engine you see the screw head.
(I have a feeling this is obvious to you but I figured why not be super clear anyway for others reading) |
Thanks Everett. So in fact once installed, you cannot tell that there's a weldnut. _________________ Charmaine
-------------
1954 Beetle - because I can
2016 Golf highline - hubby’s daily
2016 Golf R - my daily |
|
Back to top |
|
|
txoval Samba Member
Joined: January 23, 2004 Posts: 3552 Location: The Woodlands, TX
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 8:04 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
Yes, exactly what I was getting at...l
If you're not worried about using the 54 Uterus intake manifold, this is minor |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheLadyBug Samba Member
Joined: August 17, 2014 Posts: 639 Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 8:20 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
txoval wrote: |
Yes, exactly what I was getting at...l
If you're not worried about using the 54 Uterus intake manifold, this is minor |
I want to actually drive the car. The uterus is such a catastrophic failure of a part... Buying one makes little to no sense _________________ Charmaine
-------------
1954 Beetle - because I can
2016 Golf highline - hubby’s daily
2016 Golf R - my daily |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EverettB Administrator
Joined: April 11, 2000 Posts: 69809 Location: Phoenix Metro
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 10:54 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
TheLadyBug wrote: |
EverettB wrote: |
TheLadyBug wrote: |
I think I'm going to tackle adding the m6 weldnut to the clamps. Can I assume that the weldnut faces out? Can I see one up close actually in place? |
It faces out from the clamp:
The weld nut is the inside clamp though so when it's installed, the weld nut is toward the front of the car and if you are facing the engine you see the screw head.
(I have a feeling this is obvious to you but I figured why not be super clear anyway for others reading) |
Thanks Everett. So in fact once installed, you cannot tell that there's a weldnut. |
Yes but you KNOW
Plus you can tell just looking at the little screws from the front... if you are one of the crazy 1%ers that knows what you are looking at. _________________ How to Post Photos
Everett Barnes - [email protected] | My wanted ads
"Water is the only drink for a wise man" | "Communication prevents complaints"
Stop dead photo links! Post your photos to The Samba Gallery! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheLadyBug Samba Member
Joined: August 17, 2014 Posts: 639 Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:58 am Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
EverettB wrote: |
TheLadyBug wrote: |
EverettB wrote: |
TheLadyBug wrote: |
I think I'm going to tackle adding the m6 weldnut to the clamps. Can I assume that the weldnut faces out? Can I see one up close actually in place? |
It faces out from the clamp:
The weld nut is the inside clamp though so when it's installed, the weld nut is toward the front of the car and if you are facing the engine you see the screw head.
(I have a feeling this is obvious to you but I figured why not be super clear anyway for others reading) |
Thanks Everett. So in fact once installed, you cannot tell that there's a weldnut. |
Yes but you KNOW
Plus you can tell just looking at the little screws from the front... if you are one of the crazy 1%ers that knows what you are looking at. |
Haha yup and that's why I'll go to the length to modify it I also went to great length to ensure the codes on my semaphore arms were correct. Will anyone see? Nope. I'll KNOW it's right heh. I'll pick up some of these m6 screws and have them plated black. _________________ Charmaine
-------------
1954 Beetle - because I can
2016 Golf highline - hubby’s daily
2016 Golf R - my daily |
|
Back to top |
|
|
splitjunkie Samba Member
Joined: April 04, 2006 Posts: 4092
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2016 1:03 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
TheLadyBug wrote: |
EverettB wrote: |
TheLadyBug wrote: |
EverettB wrote: |
TheLadyBug wrote: |
I think I'm going to tackle adding the m6 weldnut to the clamps. Can I assume that the weldnut faces out? Can I see one up close actually in place? |
It faces out from the clamp:
The weld nut is the inside clamp though so when it's installed, the weld nut is toward the front of the car and if you are facing the engine you see the screw head.
(I have a feeling this is obvious to you but I figured why not be super clear anyway for others reading) |
Thanks Everett. So in fact once installed, you cannot tell that there's a weldnut. |
Yes but you KNOW
Plus you can tell just looking at the little screws from the front... if you are one of the crazy 1%ers that knows what you are looking at. |
Haha yup and that's why I'll go to the length to modify it I also went to great length to ensure the codes on my semaphore arms were correct. Will anyone see? Nope. I'll KNOW it's right heh. I'll pick up some of these m6 screws and have them plated black. |
They should be either cad or zinc plated. You are looking for Cheese head screw. Fillister is a close head shape but it has a slightly rounded top surface whereas a Cheese head screw is flat on top. _________________ Chris
You know, a lot of these scratches will buff right out... Jerry Seinfeld |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RockStock Samba Member
Joined: November 26, 2004 Posts: 3924 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 8:52 am Post subject: Pipe clamp screws |
|
|
Quote: |
They should be either cad or zinc plated |
No, black. Early and late. Unless you have some evidence... _________________ -StockRocks- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
motofly196 Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2008 Posts: 1467 Location: Eastern WA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 8:55 am Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
This thread is getting to be too much...
Tube brackets= painted black
Screw= Cad plated |
|
Back to top |
|
|
splitjunkie Samba Member
Joined: April 04, 2006 Posts: 4092
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 9:12 am Post subject: Re: Pipe clamp screws |
|
|
RockStock wrote: |
Quote: |
They should be either cad or zinc plated |
No, black. Early and late. Unless you have some evidence... |
I meant the screws are plated and the brackets painted black. _________________ Chris
You know, a lot of these scratches will buff right out... Jerry Seinfeld |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RockStock Samba Member
Joined: November 26, 2004 Posts: 3924 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 9:20 am Post subject: Re: Pipe clamp screws |
|
|
splitjunkie wrote: |
RockStock wrote: |
Quote: |
They should be either cad or zinc plated |
No, black. Early and late. Unless you have some evidence... |
I meant the screws are plated and the brackets painted black. |
I meant the screws are black and the brackets are black. I even entered the Post Subject ^^ _________________ -StockRocks- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carnut63 Samba Member
Joined: May 14, 2009 Posts: 336 Location: Murrieta, CA & Everett, WA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:47 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
All this talk about these brackets make me want to go out there and put mine on with JB Weld. _________________ Tyson
---> Mar 2 1955 Strato Silver Oval <---
---> July 1957 ragtop project <---
---> May 5 1966 Ghia <---
---> 1962 Ruby Red Deluxe (sold) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
1sqr2nv Samba Member
Joined: October 21, 2004 Posts: 73 Location: SJB, Ca.
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:12 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
"^Someone may know straight off, but you could start with verifying your engine number/date"
Here is a picture below of my engine number. The car has an early pan with heater knob behind ebrake, bullet front fenders and snowflakes.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
motofly196 Samba Member
Joined: June 01, 2008 Posts: 1467 Location: Eastern WA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:18 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
Did your engine have some performance parts on it? Or just the bypass filter? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
1sqr2nv Samba Member
Joined: October 21, 2004 Posts: 73 Location: SJB, Ca.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:51 am Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
motofly196 wrote: |
Did your engine have some performance parts on it? Or just the bypass filter? |
Just the bypass. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bavarian1 Samba Member
Joined: December 11, 2005 Posts: 52 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:18 am Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
Looks like a resistor maybe added to the coil? I assume the wire has broken off, any ideas? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nlorntson Crazy VW Lady
Joined: March 13, 2004 Posts: 3783 Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:32 am Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
Noise suppression for a radio. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tasb The Distributor Distributor
Joined: April 27, 2002 Posts: 6371 Location: Pentwater, Michigan
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:27 pm Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
The resistors usually came as part of a larger kit. There may be more resistors on the car, at the generator and radio. _________________ Roads Scholar &
1957 Kombi low mileage 36 hp governor equipped M 178 Slow Drag Winner 2014, 2015, 2018
1965 hardtop Deluxe Microbus owned since 1990 M 620 factory 12 v 1500cc
1961 (October)Single Cab- Road Trip Workhorse |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chrisisw Samba Member
Joined: May 30, 2004 Posts: 148 Location: Amsterdam, Holland, Europe
|
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:31 am Post subject: Re: 1954 & 1955 engines whats not correct! |
|
|
This winter I will tear apart the engine of my January 1954 and build it up again using all, period correct, reconditioned parts that I have collected over the years.
One question to the experts: the generator strap, should this be painted or not?
Thanks, Chris |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EverettB Administrator
Joined: April 11, 2000 Posts: 69809 Location: Phoenix Metro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|